≡ Menu

Warning: Check your Web site’s terms of service in the wake of Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble

Today the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (which covers California and other West Coast states, plus Hawai’i) came out with a ruling about the enforceability of “browse-wrap” license agreements, in Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble. The court affirmed a lower-court ruling that B&N’s terms of service were not enforceable against Nguyen. As a result, the arbitration agreement in the TOS didn’t apply, and so B&N must now defend a class-action lawsuit.

The court’s reasoning isn’t a model of clarity in some respects, but the main takeaways seem to be these (consult your lawyer, don’t rely on this as legal advice about your specific situation, etc.):

1. In a browse-wrap agreement, apparently it’s not enough to include just a link to the terms of service. The link should explicitly — and, preferably, conspicuously — warn the user that use of the Web page will constitute assent to a binding contract.

2. It’s best to put the link and its warning in close proximity to a button (or link) that the user must click to take action, e.g., create an account, place an order, etc.

Comments on this entry are closed.

On Contracts is Stephen Fry proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache