≡ Menu

Hot-tubbing the expert witnesses – the latest Australian import

I’ve been working on arbitration provisions for various PRECUT agree­ments that are in development. I ran across the fact that Australian courts have pioneered the notion of ordering opposing expert witnesses:

  • to confer with each other before trial;
  • to submit a joint report; and
  • perhaps most notably, to testify almost by conversation.

This approach — referred to as “hot-tubbing” the experts, a.k.a. “dueling experts” or “concurrent expert evidence” — is said to focus expert witnessess more on the search for truth, and less on being advocates for the side that hired them. The idea is at­tract­ing interest in U.S. arbitration circles, judging by traffic on some email lists that I follow.

This seems like it’d be a really interesting way to run a courtroom trial or arbitration hearing. The Aussies who have used the approach appear to be enthusiastic — see e.g., the following (all accessed Sept. 14, 2010):

I suspect, though, that the reaction of a lot of U.S. litigators would be “over my dead body”; many litigators are control freaks, and the hot-tubbing approach would strip them of most of their control over what their experts would say on the witness stand.

Comments on this entry are closed.

On Contracts is Stephen Fry proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache