≡ Menu

Changes to Web-site terms of service aren’t binding without notice, says (another) court

You’ve probably seen — and you might have drafted — Web-site terms of service like the ones that grocery-store company Safeway had, saying, in essence, we can change these terms at any time, and you’re bound by them if you continue to use the service; it’s up to you to re-read the terms each time you use the site:

Changes to Terms and Conditions

… [Safeway] will plan to notify you of any material amendments to these Terms and Conditions; however, it is your responsibility to review the Terms and Conditions before submitting each order. [Safeway] has no responsibility to notify you of any changes before any such changes are effective.

Rodman v. Safeway Inc., No. 11-cv-03003-JST part II-A (N.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2014) (granting class plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment that Safeway had overcharged on-line customers) (alteration marks by the court, emphasis added).

That clause didn’t fly with a California federal district court, citing Ninth Circuit precedent, as explained by Venkat Balasubramani.

Comments on this entry are closed.

On Contracts is Stephen Fry proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache