≡ Menu

Employee noncompetition clause invalidated because linked to stock-option grant, not to confidential information

A appeals court has affirmed a ruling that an employee noncompetition covenant was invalid under Texas law because the noncompete was tied to the issuance of a stock-option grant to the employee and not to a promise to protect confidential information:

To be ancillary to or part of an otherwise enforceable agreement, a covenant not to compete must meet the following two conditions:

(1) the consideration given by the employer in the otherwise enforceable agreement must give rise to the employer’s interest in restraining the employee from competing; and

(2) the covenant must be designed to enforce the employee’s consideration or return promise in the otherwise enforceable agreement.

… The most common types of consideration given in return for a covenant not to compete are a company’s trade secrets or other confidential information. … Financial benefits, on the other hand, do not give rise to an interest worthy of protection.

Marsh USA Inc. v. Cook, No. 05-08-00685-CV (Tex. App.—Dallas May 26, 2009) (affirming grant of partial summary judgment in favor of former employee) (citations omitted).

Comments on this entry are closed.

On Contracts is Stephen Fry proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache