≡ Menu

Quick, patent it! – NY Times editorial

From the NY Times:

The Supreme Court hears arguments Monday in a case about what kind of inventions deserve patents. The businessmen who came up with a method for hedging financial risk in energy trading sued the Patent and Trademark Office after it denied them a patent.

Allowing an abstraction of this kind to be protected would take patent law too far.


Patents perform a useful function, promoting innovation by ensuring inventors the right to profit from their creations for a period of time. But overprotection through patents is as dangerous as underprotection. It can stifle competition and infringe on the rights of non-patent holders. Not every bright idea should be protected as a property right.

Read the rest.

{ 0 comments… add one }

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.